A global rules-based order is in flux amid intensifying United States (US)-China geopolitical competition for economic and technological advantage. Concerns about the economic and security risks of dependency on China increasingly shape economic and political decision-making in the West. This paper looks at various national responses to the rise of China in the sphere of scientific collaboration and the underlying factors to their variation. While there are an emerging field related to studies of responses to Chinese research collaboration, there is yet to be a cross-national comparative examination to describe how global science is being affected by geopolitical competition, the responses taken by nations and what explains the patterns of variation. This paper will fill this gap in the literature.
More here. Citation for published version (APA): Shih, T., Cooney-O'Donoghue, D., & Chubb, A. (2023). Scientific collaboration amid geopolitical tensions: Global variation in responses to China engagement. Abstract from Technological Forecasting and Social Change Special Conference, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Andrew Chubb is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Politics, Philosophy and Religion. A graduate of the University of Western Australia, his work examines the linkages between Chinese domestic politics and international relations. More broadly, Andrew's interests include maritime and territorial disputes, strategic communication, political propaganda, and Chinese Communist Party history. Andrew is the author of Chinese Nationalism and the Gray Zone: Case Analyses of Public Opinion and PRC Foreign Policy (Naval War College Press, 2021) andthe PRC Overseas Political Activities: Risk, Reaction and the Case of Australia (Routledge and Royal United Services Institute, 2021).
Photo Credit: